More Complexity Is A Good Thing — Really

Vibrant vector illustration is showing a teacher and adult students in the middle of the process of facilitating learning. On the bottom part of the illustration there are students and teacher; above them there are different speech bubbles randomly filled with different elements/icons related with education, learning and teaching. Those elements are: light bulb for new knowledge and ideas; gears and wheels for thinking and processing; question mark for questioning; magnifying glass for looking the right solution or to look closer to the problem; brain for thinking and intelligence; speech bubbles for communication ect. Illustration is nicely layered.

However, some believe the increased pace of change is calling for deeper dives in shaping new solutions.

The Complexity Symposium in Providence, R.I., held jointly by Infosys and RISD last week, explored the need to inject more complexity into thinking and strategic planning.

At the conference, Indy Johar, co-founder and executive director of Dark Matter Labs, said it’s impossible to take on big challenges with point solutions.  Too often, strategists are guilty of improving the fringes of business, without going deep enough to define goals that will create true progress.

Johar pointed to London, which addressed climate change by banning plastic straws — a positive move, but hardly a game-changer when considering the enormity of the problem.

By contrast, Toronto identified the goal of promoting veganism, which could actually make a dent in the climate issue — but is a massively ambitious undertaking.

In this tale of two cities, one is actually recognizing the size and scale of the problem and what it will take to fix it.

Like Lucy and Ethel at the candy conveyor belt, businesses try to adopt and apply innovation as quickly as possible, ratcheting up ROI in hard-fought-for increments.  Meanwhile, entirely new models threaten to eat their lunch in one bite.



Johar mentioned an organization in the Netherlands called Buurtzorg that has developed a community healthcare business run on a technology platform empowering nurses to manage their own schedules and assignments. It employs 10,000 nurses in the field, with just 50 central staff to manage the business — sort of like an Uber of nursing, and a disruptor of the status quo.

Other providers in the space will have to turn business on its head to compete with this model.  More to the point, every business needs to be thinking about how it might be disrupted instead of just focusing on incremental gains.

To illustrate how to invite complexity, Global Head of Digital at Infosys Scott Sorokin pointed to a chair: “We can all see this is just a chair. But if you step back, you can observe how it’s placed in the room, and from farther back, where in the building — and if you keep zooming out, you gain an even broader perspective of how the chair fits into the city, the country, the world, etc.”

The idea here is that a broader perspective is necessary to connect the dots between new concepts and technologies that fit all the pieces together in organizations and their ecosystems.

All this is relevant to the way AI is being applied to create intuitive systems and processes. Before determining the algorithms that will power their businesses, companies need to begin with organizing their data, right?  No, back up.  They need to begin with how decisions will be made across their organizations. Back up even further.  They need to consider how they will operate and what kind of business they are in. Beyond that, they actually need to consider the cultural implications of new architectures and how they fit with the values of the organizations being (re)created.

This may feels like trying to boil the ocean and hurts the head.   But given the massive shifts that are occurring, companies looking to survive and grow will have to grapple with this process.

In doing so, they will need to hire the right kind of talent.  Mariana Amtullo, associate professor, strategic design and management at Parsons School of Design, cited a study from Unesco, The Futures of Learning Report, which projects that the top four skill sets most valued by institutions around the world will be critical thinking, problem-solving, communication and collaboration, and  creativity and innovation.  The people with these skills are the ones you will want working together to create more ambitious goals by adding complexity to the thought process.

Infosys and RISD plan to do just that with the creation of a joint venture called The Complexity Labs, which promises to create entirely new models for working and living — helping to create a future where embracing complexity is a good thing.

by Sarah Fay
Courtesy of mediapost

Be the first to comment on "More Complexity Is A Good Thing — Really"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.